ACMi-21
Media partner

Site stats: May traffic | Cambridge Day: News >> 

AHS Building Committee supports new total cost: $299M

Latest HMFH design of AHS front supported Jan. 22.Latest HMFH design of AHS front supported Jan. 22.

UPDATED: The estimated cost to rebuild Arlington High School was reduced to $299 million after the school building committee reviewed a dizzying list of cost considerations on Tuesday, Jan. 29. The School Committee continued the discussion Wednesday night, and the building committee again Thursday.

Since last summer, the project total has stood at $308 million. In a 11-4-1 vote, the committee agreed to the lower total after Skanska USA, the project manager, provided estimates they viewed as the most accurate to date.

Marking the three-hour meeting were searching questions aimed at trying to clear up confusions, apparent vacillation about how to proceed as well as moments of pointed frustration. Consider these specifics:

Meeting highlights

-- Jim Burrows, Skanska project manager, said cost estimates were reviewed and reconciled for eight hours Jan. 28. The process was still being completed, but he called $299 million, including $243 million in construction costs, "good numbers." Contingencies were reduced to help arrive at the lower total, he said, and stood at $11 million for construction and $14 million for design.

Quote bar, red 
'SITE AMENITIES'
AHS rebuild project

Arlington High School, Schematic Design

Items for separate pricing (Source: HMFH)

1.) competition baseball field (flipped fields/new backstops/grading less softball disturbance due to geo-wells/reseeding/drainage-irrigation changes): $693,815

2.) OUT turf fields - baseball & softball (above cost of grass): $1,130,264

3.) amphitheater (AV/stage/granite tiers): $471,121

4.) Minuteman Bikeway ramp access: $2,892,755

5.) ramp/stair at east side: $668,560

6.) traffic light at Mill Street $479,500

Net-zero/mechinla system

7.) geothermal wells (with partial VRF): $9,864,000

8.) containerized bad soil due to drilling wells: $2,740,000
VS.
9.) OUT VRF (with partial geothermal) SAVINGS OVER BASE DESIGN: ($3,738,730)

10.) PV infrastructure/super-structure at RTUs/installation at roof: $1,265,880

11.) PV infrastructure/structure/installation at parking lot: $1,433,020

12.) PV infrastructure/structure/installation at north side bleacher location: $289,070

13.) electrical vehicle charging at 10% of parking: $205,500

14.) electrical vehicle ready infrastructure at remaining 90% of parking: $184,950

15.) bike parking for 100 bikes (per LEED),each rack holds 2, therefore 50 racks, $82,200

PREMIUM for HISTORIC REUSE

16.) restore/reuse of existing Collomb facade at large courtyard in Phase 2 $2,055,000

17.) OUT fabricate new Collomb facade at large courtyard in Phase 2: $2,466,000

18.) Fusco facade reuse/relocation: $473,472

19.) Salvage, repair, store and reinstall Fusco wood panel: $20,550

20.) Salvage, repair, store and reinstall Old Hall proscenium, $34,250

21.) Salvage, repair, store and reinstall Old Hall plaster friezes: $27,400

22.) Salvage, repair, store and reinstall River of Hands mosaic, $41,100

23.) Salvage and repair clock: $27,400

POTENTIAL VALUE ENGINEERING ITEMS

30% of copper siding to brick veneer, $556,611

60% of copper siding to brick veneer $556,611 Quote bar, red

-- Lori Cowles, principal at project architect HMFH, led the committee through a list of costs items priced separately in an attempt to spur discussion about what may be needed -- or cut. No decisions have been made. Three on the list, labeled "SITE AMENITIES" (see box at right), are shown as "out." They are:

* Turf fields, at $1,130,264;

* VRF (an air-conditioning system using partial geothermal), $3,738,730; and

* Fabricate new Collomb facade at large courtyard, $2,466,000.

-- A spreadsheet handed out at the meeting provided information about projects cost, what is not included in the project and sample building items subject to value engineering. Read it here >>

Turf wanted

The discussion of "site amenities" spurred one question: Who wants turf returned to the costs to be included in the $299 million? Principal Matthew Janger and Jeff Thielman, committee chairman, did.

Janger said long-term saving will offset immediate costs, adding that speedier usability following rain put the matter "high on my list of priorities." Thielman referred to groups in town pushing for turf, in part to expand field use.

Superintendent Kathleen Bodie was told that the Mass. School Building Authority will not reimburse for $1.1 million turf, but it could be part of project cost.

As to the ramp connecting the Minuteman Bikeway to the rebuilt school, listed at $2.9 million, Cowles said she thought it could "get a little less expensive."

The principal asked about $471,121 in extra costs for the amphitheater, and Cowles responded: "I think there's savings in there."

Bleacher move, overall costs

The 500 bleachers on the bikeway side of Peirce Field are to be moved next to the "home" seats and, in their place will be solar panels. Committee member Jud Pierce said he did not like the look, preferring panel on building.

The architect said the last series of items seek to repurpose existing features -- paneling in Fusco and Old Hall, stone friezes in Old Hall, a long mosaic and the "guts" of the clock in tower. 

Member Dan Ruiz, an architect, suggested these adjustments in one possible scenario: $2 million for columns, a 60-percent reduction for copper ($1.1 million); fewer geothermal wells for VRF ($3.7 million); a simpler ramp to bike path design ($1 million); delete PV over parking areas ($1.4 million). He would add back the turf field ($1.1 million). That makes a subtotal of $8.1 million plus 20-percent soft costs equals $9.72 million. 

At one point later in the meeting, Janger expressed frustration with Cowles about process. "We have come this far, and now we're told things are too fine-tuned to change," he said. Cowles disagreed, defending her process in a sharp way.

The tense moment passed, and the discussion turned to costs.

Member Ryan Katofsky noted that $299 million is "technically where we hoped to be, but we could push further .... What is the goal?"

A bit later, Town Manager Adam Chapdelaine, urging members to focus, suggested $295 million.

As to goals, Janger said the committee needed to agree on a reasonable amount to spend and how the building should look. If it's between columns or turf, he said he'd give up columns. Still, he said, "The goal is not to look like a building that looks like a shopping mall."

$299M not low enough

Sandy Pooler, the deputy town manager, said he had no particular number in mind, but that he thought $299 million was not low enough. He thought it should be below $290 million, perhaps $285 million.

Member John Cole, a veteran of the town building committee from the late 1990s, offered the quote of the night. He said he thought the AHS front "should be referential, not reverential."

Member Brian Rehrig noted the amount of energy the committee has put into the facade. affinity for facade as a whole. "We're the ones fetishizing the columns," he suggested. "Voters would think we're out of our minds spending $2 million" on restoring or reusing of the existing Collomb facade.

Beyond the total cost, committee members moved ahead to the number important to voters: What might be the amount needed is raised taxes?

Pooler said two hard numbers are needed -- the project total cost going to School Building Authority after Feb. 12 and the appropriation to be put before Town Meeting this spring. By law, the debt exclusion part of the June 11 vote need not have a specific figure, but the campaign for voters should have such a number.

Reimbursement estimate

The closest the committee could come last night to the numbers that voters most need to know is the estimated amount of state reimbursement, which Pooler suggested is "at most $100 million."

Whatever that number is will be subtracted from the project total -- or, at this point, about $190 million.

During public participation, at the meeting's start, two people of the five in the audience spoke.

Michael DeLisi said he was most looking forward to the discussion of cost. He said thought the $3008 million estimate would have come down before now.

"You're not going to lose my vote," he said, but he found it hard to answer questions he hears from neighbors.

A second speaker expressed concern about design, asking that it "be a building for our time and not a historic fantasy.

Next steps

The cost discussions begun Jan. 29 are expected to continue through Tuesday, Feb. 5, with a final voted expected Feb. 12. After documents are submitted, a decision from the state is expected April 10. 


Jan. 26, 2019: AHS rebuild committee supports refined design

Jan. 22, 2018, HMFH full presentation >>
Jan. 19, 2019: Board weighs where to site prekindergarten, district offices in AHS rebuild
Jan. 15, 2019: Second AHS rebuild forum draws estimated 200 -- 25 with questions 
First forum, Nov. 28, 2018: Fears about cost may divide town, but numbers face more scrutiny
Dec. 5, 2018: AHS rebuild committee directs architect to work with tradition
Nov. 24, 2018: AHS rebuild committee reviews 3 new exterior designs, gives go-ahead to memorial effort
Nov. 10, 2018: AHS design discussion turns to interior ideas, and reaction is positive
Sept. 5, 2018: AHS rebuild design raises questions, but process has just begun
Aug. 29: AHS rebuild approved to move on to schematic design stage
June 26, 2018: DESIGN CHOSEN: High school to be rebuilt, not renovated
June 6, 2018: AHS rebuild process moves toward one design by end of June
 Official information about the high school building project  
June 7, ", 2018: THIRD FORUM: 100 tour AHS, look into future; hear flexibility touted
Jan. 12, 2018: 125 attend as public process to launch AHS update underway
Dec. 20, 2017: Could new AHS be built elsewhere in town? 4 sites suggested
Dec. 12,"2017: Designer chosen for revamped Arlington High project
Oct. 4, 2017: 3 finalists chosen to design revamped Arlington High

This news summary was published Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2019, and updated, to correct the headline to read $299M, not $290M. 

Your People

S. Nicholas Kriketos

Arlington resident honored for years of service to St. Athanasius

S. Nicholas KriketosS. Nicholas Kriketos' service to St. Athanasius the Great parish in Arlington nearly 30 years was recognized by parish members June 12. Now the building and facilities manager of the Appleton Street church, he has served with dignity, loyalty, respect and humility. When he was…
Corwin Dickson is ready to compete.

Arlington artist helps design women's hockey logo

Corwin Dickson is ready to compete. Arlington artist Corwin Dickson has helped design a Pride-inspired merchandise line for the Premier Hockey Federation (PHF), the home of professional women's hockey in North America. A series of unique, Pride-inspired PHF designs are available for a limited time…

Housing Authority

Your Businesses

Latest comments

Bob Sprague What do we do about Arlington's news desert?
27 May 2022
Good question, Eric. Since it became a nonprofit last fall, YourArlington has been led by a board se...
Guest - Eric Segal What do we do about Arlington's news desert?
25 May 2022
I wonder what it would cost to have a local, nonprofit digital news network -- like this but maybe a...
Bob Sprague What do we do about Arlington's news desert?
25 May 2022
I agree withg Mark's comment about democracy and local support for the press. One answer to this iss...

FACEBOOK BOX: To see all images, click the PHOTOS link just below

 



Support YourArlington

An informed Arlington
keeps democracy alive
:
Why we are your news source >>

Donate Button

YourArlington is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit.

Your contributions are tax-deductible.

Your Arts

Your democracy

Your housing

Your Police, Fire