Arlington business: Your ad ...
Robbins Farm on a spring day, May 7, 2013, with YourArlington logo
At Robbins Farm on a spring day, you can see the Boston's skyline and the Brackett School clock tower.
... could be here for $5
a day
Paid advertisement

ENTERTAINMENT

Regent logo

The Regent Theatre on Medford Street is Arlington's showplace of stars.
For an up-to-date listing to know what's on stage what's coming, go to www.regenttheatre.com.

OPEN MIC

Open mic logo

At Jam 'n Java, a coffee spot just off Mass. Ave. in Arlington Center, the microphone is open Friday nights once a month for local entertainers.

For an up-to-date listing, go to Open Mic.

BENN'S SHOTS

Camera logo

Arlington resident Benn Craig adds photos of Arlington to his website. See them here >>

Group pushing Mass. Ave. ballot question seeks probe of alleged collusion

User Rating:  / 2
PoorBest 

Mass. Ave. Corridor logo

The East Arlington Concerned Citizens Committee (EACCC), describing its successful effort to place a nonbinding question about the Mass. Ave. Corridor project on the April town election ballot as a victory, has requested an investigation of what it calls "long pattern of collusion to eliminate public participation."

In a 17-page letter to Tomasz Janikula, an engineer who oversees the project, EACCC members asked the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to conduct a probe.

The letter also charges that the town, MassDOT and the town's engineering firm Fay, Spofford & Thorndike (FST) misrepresented that the town's open house meeting on April 4, 2012, met the FHWA recommendation of last Aug. 20 for another formal public meeting on the roadway design.

Last, the letter says, FST submitted inaccurate and incomplete data for an FHWA required analysis for the town's roadway design.

These claims are made in a news release that Eric Berger, longtime foe of the Corridor project, sent to YourArlington.

The release says MassDOT, the town of Arlington and its engineering firm engaged in collusion to eliminate the public from the development of the Mass. Ave. Corridor Project. No required public meetings were held for six years until October 2008, "when the corridor design was already set in stone," the release says.

"That design was revealed at a meeting in February 2009 and railroaded through without input and without any required alternate designs being presented," Berger said in the release.

"At the heart of our request for an investigation is the long-standing pattern of misinformation or deception," Berger added in the release.

Since the fall of 2008, town officials have maintained that the public has been involved and informed.

The release also says:

"On January 10, 2013, the East Arlington Concerned Citizens Committee won a victory in its long fight against the removal of any travel lanes on the corridor. The town's registrars determined the EACCC's nonbinding question must be placed on the ballot for the April 6 town election.

"More than 3,100 signatures submitted were certified as those of Arlington's registered voters. The question asks voters, 'Shall the Town have four vehicular travel lanes on Massachusetts Avenue in East Arlington as now practiced? Yes_No_.'

Selectmen twice refuse to place on ballot

"'The selectmen twice refused to place our question on the ballot so we took it to the people. They overwhelmingly agreed with us,'" the release quotes Berger.

"'Town officials knew there would be tremendous opposition from residents and business owners in removing any travel lanes on the Mass. Ave. Corridor. They colluded to block public participation,'" Berger said in the release. "The corridor serves as transportation life blood for our community. Squeezing in bike lanes close to the safer Minuteman Bikeway cripples 98% of the corridor's users, undermining safety."

The release is dated Jan. 21. Berger declined to explain whether the date is correct, and if it is why the release was sent out Jan. 27.

YourArlington first reported that 3,684 signatures were ceritified on Jan. 11.

The EACCC at the time declined two requests for comment.

The group remained publicly silent on the issue until The Globe published a story Jan. 27

That story did not report the group's latest charges.

Declines to address releasing letter

YourArlington requested a copy of the 17-page letter, and Berger declined to address the request, saying only that EACCC members would be glad to meet.

Contracts for the project from Pond Lane to Cambridge in East Arlington are scheduled to be awarded this spring, with work to begin this summer.

It is unclear what force the nonbinding vote in April would have should Corridor opponents be successful.


OPINION: Ballot effort called misleading
Word on Street: An oddly worded measure 


Related links to Mass. Ave. project:

Oct. 17, 2012: Mass. Ave. critics again seek ballot question | Word on the Street, April 8, 2012: As many as 80 view plans | June 14, 2011: 4-1 selectmen vote pushes avenue project toward 75% goal | April 13, 2011: 345 hear speakers for, against

Globe, Aug. 8, 2009: Eric Berger's cause | E. Arlington Concerned Citizens (Part 2) | Livable Streets Coalition | Town project information


This story was published Monday, Jan. 28, 2013.

Add comment

People in this conversation

  • Guest (Mark Kaepplein)

    Report Admin Tools

    Personally, I think the bigger issue over public input is having it ignored, no matter how many public meetings there were or could be. When Selectmen decide to ignore the will of residents, non-binding public meeting feedback is pointless too - might have just as well had no public meetings!
    Mark Kaepplein

    Comment last edited on about 3 months ago by Bob Sprague

ad image

ad image
Sunday May 19, 2013 |  2:10:58 p.m.

YOUR VIEW: Site's only blog

  • John Leone

    Cut out voters in finance revamp? No, moderator says

    The following viewpoint was submitted by John D. Leone, moderator of Arlington's Town Meeting: The most important vote at this year’s Town Meeting, was not the passage of our budget and capital plan, the leaf-blower bylaw compromise (passed) or the plastic water bottle ban (failed).  It was the unceremonious and near unanimous, no-action vote on Article 22.   For those unaware, Article 22 sought permission from Town Meeting for the selectmen to file home-rule legislation to allow for the creation of an appointed "coordinated department of municipal finance" and the dissolution of the elected treasurer’s position. In essence, this misguided article wanted to eliminate the elected treasurer position and replace the entire office of the treasurer with a new coordinated finance department headed by an appointed director of finance under the authority of the town manager. ...

  • Anonymous Netizen

    Scoop poops out

    I would like to commend "Menotomy Observer" – aka Steve Harrington – for first reporting about the dumped snow in the athletics field behind Stop & Shop. The report was published Feb. 13 at Truepersons.com. He got the scoop, but he failed to document key claims with respect to the field. He writes: "The DPW used the high school practice fields for a snow graveyard resulting in extreme damage and runoff that will affect spring sports." In fact, the damage will require a $100,000 repair, as the town manager told me. ...

  • Your risk logo

    Abuse case stirs further queries

    The following commentary was written by Peter Fuller, a Precinct 20 Town Meeting member, and published in February. His views expand on those expressed earlier on the Arlington email list and include points that others raised and asked him about. His comments remain relevant in May: The Arlington Boys & Girls Club sent a letter, dated Feb. 7, 2013, to current members, informing them of an investigation into allegations of sexual abuse of children at the Club. While this letter reads as apologetic in tone and at first reading seemingly complete in explaining the situation, some statements in the letter raise further questions: ...

View more featured blog entries
123

POLL: MURAL'S FATE?

'HITS' KEEP COMIN'

QUANTCAST MEASURES MARKET

Bookmark and Share